BMC Questions Indian Navy Over Tree Felling at INS Trata After Complaint by Adv YP Singh

Mumbai: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has issued a notice to film exhibitor PVR Inox over allegations of monopolistic practices in film screening. The action follows a petition filed by legal activist Adv YP Singh, who accused the multiplex chain of discrimination against small and independent filmmakers while favoring big-budget productions with star-studded casts.

The anti-monopoly commission has asked PVR Inox to submit a response within four weeks regarding these allegations. According to Adv YP Singh, the dominance of large production houses and their influence over major multiplex chains have stifled creative, high-content cinema. He argues that excessive promotion of formulaic, low-content films has led to an industry-wide shift, restricting innovation and diversity in filmmaking.

“Even directors who want to make meaningful, high-content films are being forced to adopt formulaic storytelling due to the monopolistic control of exhibition spaces. This harms both the film industry and the intellectual growth of our nation,” said Adv YP Singh.

The former IPS officer is in the final stages of completing his film, The Indian Supari Company, which explores the intricate relationship between corporate entities and investigative agencies in manipulating legal outcomes. He alleged that monopolistic control over cinema screens is creating formidable entry barriers for independent filmmakers, making it difficult for their films to reach audiences.

“PVR has been entering into special agreements with large production houses to provide an excessive number of screens, aggressive promotional support, and privileged marketing terms—none of which are extended to independent filmmakers. This results in inequitable allocation of screening opportunities and undermines fair competition,” claimed Adv YP Singh.

The CCI’s notice marks a significant step in investigating alleged unfair trade practices in the film exhibition industry. If the commission finds evidence of monopolistic behavior, PVR Inox may be required to implement corrective measures to ensure a level playing field for all filmmakers.

As the case progresses, independent filmmakers and industry experts will be closely monitoring the proceedings, hoping for a resolution that promotes fair competition and diverse storytelling in Indian cinema.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *